Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Four Dollar a Gallon Gasoline Doesn’t Scare Me, but What Does Scare Me Is……

It’s just a matter of time, this month, next month, this year, next year $4.00 a gallon gasoline and higher will be a factor in our lives.


May 15 AOL quoted Phil Flynn, a senior market analyst at Alaron Trading in Chicago as saying, "I think it's going to happen. Unless things change dramatically, I think we're going to see $4 a gallon." Flynn said, “Gasoline stocks have fallen for the past twelve weeks straight and are now at their lowest level for this time of year since 1956.”


In the same article “Peter Beutel, an oil analyst at consulting firm Cameron Hanover, noted in a recent report that refineries have not operated above 95 percent capacity since Hurricanes Rita and Katrina in 2005. Before 2005, the refineries, clustered around the Gulf coast and badly damaged in the storms, routinely operated at over 95 percent capacity.”


However, $4.00 a gallon gasoline doesn’t scare me.


Despite some inflation, a change in life style by some, $4.00 a gallon gasoline can probably be digested by the American economy. It won’t be pleasant, but will probably spur some of us to opt for more flex fuel and/or more efficient fuel consuming vehicles.


What does scare me is the continuing trouble in Nigeria. The United States imports approximately 14% of its oil from that African country.


Today, The NIGERIAN TRIBUNE reported “As at last week, the militants in the Niger Delta put Nigeria oil industry on edge. Eni [Agip] Companies in Nigeria were the worst hit as the attackers paralysed operations at the Brass oil terminal of Agip by sabotaging the pipelines feeding the terminal. Chevron Nigeria Limited also announced that it would begin to withdraw staff from offshore location because of escalating violence in the creeks after six of its workers were kidnapped and it also had to shut in 57,000 barrels of oil.”


What happens if the terrorists continue their endeavors and eventually bring Nigeria’s oil exports to a stop?


All we need to do is look back to the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973. Then the United States was only importing 30% of its oil consumption in more than 60% in 2006.


The Arab oil embargo of 1973 created a 6%-7% percent decline in consumption of oil by the United States, . Yet, the price of oil quadrupled and the NYSE lost $97 billion of value.


Now here is what really scares me.


Imagine if the situation in Nigeria continues to deteriorate to the point where its oil fields are shut down creating a 14% shortfall in oil supplies to the United States. That’s more than double the shortfall that was created in 1973 by the Arab Oil Embargo.


The results of such a shortfall would make the consequences the United States suffered from the Arab Oil Embargo pale in comparison.


It is easy to imagine a nightmare of double digit inflation, a downward spiraling of the standard of living, long lines at gas and even food stations, and possible riots and worse.



That nightmare is what spurs me to urge all who read this to work for U.S. energy independence through:

  • The development of U.S. fuel resources.

  • The continuing development of alternative fuel resources , such as ethanol, wind, solar, and even such esoteric sources such as the fusion of Helium3 .

  • Conservation in vehicle fuel consumption.

  • The development of and the use of more energy efficient housing, manufacturing and transportation.

  • Development of new modes of mass transit..


If the United States can achieve near energy independence than the nightmare of severe energy shortages will never occur. Instead the nightmare is replaced greater prosperity throughout the world through the development of new and alternative energy resources. These developments will raise the standard of living of even those in third world nations, without increasing the environmental footprint that such development created in the past.


That’s why USA Energy Independence dot com exists. To provide you our reader a format of news and views of technology and leadership that can prevent a nightmare and create a dream.









Sunday, May 06, 2007

Stossel Sacrifices Solid Reporting in "Corn God..." report

The rebuttal of Keith Sanderson, President and Co-Founder U.S.A. Energy Independence to John Stossel of ABC's recent piece "Sacrificing our Children to the Corn God."
John,
I am usually quite impressed by your objectivity and in-depth research regarding "Myths and Lies and Downright Stupidity". . However this time you and your team showed about as little in-depth knowledge about ethanol as you accuse many of your colleagues about having about science or economics.
Here are four reasons you are wrong regarding your piece "Sacrificing our Children to the Corn God,"
1. Those who are in the hunt for ethanol such as Andy Karsner, Undersecretary of State, Vinod Khosla cited as one of the most influential venture captiaists by both Forbes and Fortune magazines, Admiral Woolsey, VP Booz & Allen and former head of the Central Intelligence Agency, and Dr. Chu of of the Livermore research center who just received a $500,000,000 research grant from BP will all agree that corn ethanol is only a tranistional fuel source. They would likely agree that the U.S could not depend upon corn or row crop ethanol as the primary source for ethanol. The future of ethanol is in cellulosic ethanol. And had your team done its job they would have known that. You and your team failed to either understand the transitional nature of corn ethanol or chose not to include the whole story about ethanol in your report.
2. Luddite-like you chose to report on ethanol as if all things will remain the same as far as energy. Here are the facts. According to the U.S. department of energy the U.S. imported more than 60% of its petroleum needs in 2007. Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Nigeria each provide us more than 10% of our oil. These nations are either unstable politically or located in unstable parts of the world. Imagine what would happen if something occurred to interrupt their oil to us. To help you imagine just think of the oil crisis in 1973. At that time the United States was importing far less oil as a percentage of its needs than the 60% of its consumption that it imports today. Gasoline rose in price from $.30 a gallon to $1.20. Today, a similar curtailment of oil supply could raise gasoline pump prices from $3.20 a gallon to almost $12.00 a gallon. Without both corn and cellulosic ethanol development a curtailment in oil imports to the U.S. will be crippling to your economy and have a much greater negative impact on our children than your claims of danger from ethanol development will ever have..
3. Transport. Yes corn or cellulosic ethanol are more corrosive than gasoline. However, there is not the need to transport ethanol the great distances one must transport gasoline. Why? Because ethanol refineries are not scalable as are gasoline refineries. The nature of ethanol refineries (corn or celluolsic) scatter them across the country. Yes some modifications will have to be made to transport ethanol, but there will not be a need to secure pipelines in unstable areas such as Nigeria, and the Middle East, or secure ports and shipping lanes from those nations. In addition, Louisiana, Texas,California refine 45% of the nation's gasoline. We luckily escaped severe damage on Louisiana refineries by Hurricane Katrina. Experts such as Admiral Woolsey suggest that having our gasoline refining assets concentrated leaves this country open to supply interruptions due to both natural disasters and terrorism. The very nature of ethanol scatters our refining assets across the country.
4. Technology moves on despite the fact your reporting doesn't recognize it. The automakers tell us they will have hybrid vehicles within the next ten years that will get more than 100 miles per gallon. The average commuter (40 miles per day) will not consume a drop of gasoline with new lithium battery technology. The increased gasoline mileage coupled with the production of corn ethanol and increased production of cellulosic ethanol can and will seriously decrease our dependence on foreign oil.
Mr. Stossel, I invite you to unlike most of your peers, admit that you made an error in reporting and set the record straight by busting the unfair myth you have created about ethanol by concentrating on corn ethanol and not on the total ethanol story.

Keith W. Sanderson
President and Cofounder